The proposed network
A model for funding independent security evaluations and making evaluators accountable.
Paid work
Customers would pay for scoped evaluations. Fees would fund testing, independent reproduction, and challenge resolution.
Token participation
The proposed token would connect eligible participation to a defined share of customer-funded fees. Collateral and penalties could make misconduct costly. Eligibility, allocations, and enforcement remain design questions.
What gives it economic value?
The hypothesis is that demand for useful evaluations can support demand for participation in the network. That connection depends on actual customers, service costs, enforceable fee rights, and the amount of token supply eligible to participate. Token price growth is not an established outcome.
Concept stage. No live service, customer revenue, deployed contracts, or token launch is claimed.